Equity & Joint Ventures
in Chatham

Finding the right equity or joint venture partner for your Chatham development requires access to a network of investors who are actively seeking property development exposure. We connect developers with family offices, high-net-worth individuals, and institutional investors who understand the Kent market and have capital ready to deploy. In Chatham, where the median property price is £300,000, a medium-scale development targeting a GDV of £2.4M could deliver net profits of 18-25% on cost, making it a compelling proposition for equity partners.

The equity and JV market is relationship-driven. Unlike debt, where products are broadly standardised, every equity arrangement is bespoke. The profit split, governance framework, decision-making authority, and exit mechanics all need to be negotiated individually. As experienced brokers, we understand what equity partners expect and can help you structure a proposition that attracts the right capital while protecting your development management role.

Whether you need equity to fund 100% of project costs or want a JV partner to supplement your equity alongside senior development finance, we structure arrangements that maximise your return while giving the capital partner the governance and reporting they require. Submit your project to start the conversation.

The live Medway Council planning register currently shows 71 residential applications awaiting decision in Chatham, together proposing 1,608 units. The largest — at Land At Stoke Road Allhallows Rochester ME3 9PE — proposes 330 units. That pipeline is a useful gauge of both local competition and lender familiarity with Chatham schemes.

For a Chatham scheme around £3.0M GDV, a typical structure of 65% senior debt and 20% mezzanine leaves an equity requirement near £450,000 — the slice a JV or equity partner can fund against a share of profit.

We source equity capital across Kent in several formats: pure equity investment where the partner funds project costs in exchange for a profit share, land-for-equity arrangements where the developer contributes a consented site, development management agreements where you manage the build for a fee plus profit participation, and hybrid structures combining equity with senior debt for optimal capital efficiency.

For larger Chatham schemes (typically £5M+ GDV), institutional equity from real estate private equity funds and sovereign wealth-backed vehicles is available. These partners bring operational sophistication and can move quickly on deals that fit their mandate. For smaller projects, family offices and high-net-worth individuals offer more flexibility on structure and governance, with faster decision-making timescales.

We also arrange forward-funding structures where an investor purchases the completed development before construction begins, providing the developer with certainty of exit and the capital to build. This model is particularly relevant for build-to-rent schemes in Chatham and for developers who want to de-risk their sales exposure.

Equity and JV capital for Chatham schemes comes from private investors, family offices, and institutional partners rather than the lending market — though funders like Together will sit alongside JV equity in the senior position. Partners underwrite the same metrics a lender would (GDV, loan-to-cost, projected IRR) plus the sponsor's delivery record, and structures are typically ring-fenced in a dedicated SPV spanning residential, mixed-use, and industrial schemes. The equity slice also combines with the wider debt market — bridging finance to secure a site while the JV documents complete, or a buy to let refinance where the partnership retains completed units for income.

Developer profit shares in JV arrangements typically range from 50-70%, depending on what you contribute to the deal. A developer providing land with planning permission and managing the build will command a higher share (60-70%) than one contributing only management expertise (40-55%). The equity partner usually receives a preferred return of 8-12% per annum on invested capital before the profit split applies.

The total cost of equity capital, when expressed as an annualised return to the investor, is typically 15-25% per annum. This is higher than debt finance, but equity bears risk that debt does not. If your scheme underperforms, the equity partner shares the downside. If it outperforms, they share the upside. This risk-sharing dynamic can be more appropriate than high-leverage debt for schemes with less certain outcomes.

Legal costs for structuring a JV are higher than for a standard debt facility, reflecting the bespoke nature of the documentation. Expect £15,000-£30,000 in combined legal fees for a typical JV agreement. Professional due diligence costs (RICS valuation, site investigation, planning review) add a further £10,000-£20,000, though these reports benefit the project regardless of funding structure.

Equity partners conduct thorough due diligence on both the project and the developer. They assess your track record (completed projects, financial outcomes, references from lenders and contractors), the site (title, planning status, environmental conditions), the financial appraisal (costs, GDV, programme, sensitivity analysis), and your financial standing. Having a professional information memorandum prepared before approaching equity partners accelerates the process significantly.

First-time developers can access JV capital, though the terms will reflect the additional risk. Having a strong professional team, an experienced contractor, and ideally a quantity surveyor who has verified your cost plan helps compensate for a limited personal track record. Some equity partners prefer to work with newer developers because the profit-sharing arrangement provides better value than lending to experienced operators who have access to cheaper debt.

The minimum viable scheme for most equity partners is typically £1M+ GDV, with the sweet spot being £3M-£15M. Larger institutional investors typically require £10M+ GDV. For very small projects, mezzanine finance or bridging loans may be more practical alternatives to equity capital.